Skip to content

Maxambit (the blog) Retires

13-Dec-07

Why?

Well, there’s no exciting, dramatic, or melodramatic story to tell. I adjust my behavior from time to time when I believe something is out of balance in my life. I’ve been thinking about calling it quits since September. A comment Cobb left over at P6’s spot yesterday probably helped me make my final decision. There’s a lot I’d like to do, and being a part-time blogger, blogging the way I like to blog, eats up more time than I thought it would. I considered cutting back instead of quitting altogether. But I doubt I would enjoy blogging if I only posted once per month. I don’t really understand the psychology behind that, but I know myself well enough.

In September, I noticed that I began to feel the urge to write things for this blog just because I hadn’t written things for a while. That was the first bad sign for me. I smelled Vanity. I’ve had my bouts with Vanity, and she is always lurking. I never wanted this blogging thing to be a vanity boost or an obligation. I just wanted good conversations every now and then. And I got them here. But I can participate in good conversations as an occasional commentator, while investing far fewer of my leisure hours each month.

I estimate I spent 300 to 400 hours blogging, reading blogs, and leaving comments on other blogs in 2007. At least twice as much time as I spent as a blog reader and occasional commentator in 2006. I’ve been overblogging—an uneconomical vice. And, to make matters worse, the extra leisure hours I spent blogging in 2007 were spent at the expense of hours I probably would have used in order to read more and write higher quality works. I could have read or reread at least two-dozen of the books I’ve had my eye on for a while. I could have finished one of the series of philosophical essays I’ve been working on for a few years. I could have begun my bildungsroman or practiced for it by writing a few short stories. Instead, I overblogged in 2007. That’s imbalance. Time for a correction.

So, today, I retire from blogging, certainly for a year and probably for good. But I’ll see you around the blogosphere, in the threads.

Thank you all for the worthwhile conversations.

Your friend,

E.C. Hopkins

If you need to contact me but you don’t have one of my email addresses, send me a note through the contact form.

Be Ashamed to Die…

11-Dec-07

Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity.
Horace Mann, address at Antioch College, 1859, US educator (1796 - 1859)

More teachers should pass this on to their students. More friends should pass this on to their friends. And, more parents should pass this on to their children.

If you’re a middle-class or upper-class African American, you are probably one of the world’s top 10% wealthiest, most powerful, or most prestigious peoples of color. And you are probably in a better position to help humanity achieve important economic, scientific, technological, political, artistic, and cultural victories using the vast resources you control or influence than the world’s 90% poorest, least prestigious, and least powerful peoples of color are. If you would embrace Horace Mann’s advice, or rather his plea, then you might believe that you would have to do something substantial in order to die unashamed. You might believe you owe humanity a special victory or two as a payment of sorts for the comfortable and enriching life you inherited the opportunity to live, for the comfortable and enriching lives you were able to share with your closest friends and family.

Do try to use your powers wisely. Your powers are far from modest. Unfortunately, too few of us care enough about people we don’t interact with regularly to take the time to learn how we could use our powers more wisely, for humanity’s sake. Too few of those who do know how they could use their powers more wisely find the courage to use them more wisely. Though they are already wealthy, prestigious, and powerful, they still fear loss of economic opportunity or increased social or cultural discomfort. These petty fears, if they would allow them to control their actions, might cause them to lose opportunities to win meaningful victories. The opportunity costs of their fearful inaction might be substantial for those who are living and those who will live here. Humanity, especially its long-mistreated Africans, needs many, many more meaningful victories. And, those who would be best situated to win a meaningful victory or two–the wealthy, the prestigious, and the powerful–might have more to be ashamed of if they would die without having even attempted to win a single substantial victory.

Now Let’s Try to Learn More About the Negative Effects On the Hyper-Minorities

07-Dec-07

Below the break is an excerpt from “Understanding the Negative Effects of Legal Education on Law Students: A Longitudinal Test of Self-Determination Theory” by Kennon M. Sheldon (University of Missouri–Columbia) and Lawrence S. Krieger (Florida State University), which was published only a few months ago in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 6, 883-897 (2007).

Law school is a social psychological gauntlet for law students in general. Imagine what it is like for minority law students who are not very Euro-Americentric, especially Afrocentric or quasi-Afrocentric African Americans. Keep in mind that the data and statistical analyses this paper is based on were not collected or analyzed for the purposes of enabling the authors to examine lower-class and lower-middle-class African American students’ unique psychological challenges related to cultural discomfort (see Cultural Discomfort and Cultural Discomfort II) or the psychological challenges that result from one’s hyper-minority status in very competitive social environments (see Hyper-Minorities and Academic Performance).

I believe the authors’ arguments in this popular scholarly paper should help make my arguments in Cross-Cultural Wisdom & Elite Law School Admissions Decisions Algorithms even more persuasive.

Hat tip to the enigmatic, often discomforting, ocassionally quasi-subversive, and almost-always-worth-reading Supremacy Claus for reminding me of this paper in “Toxic Effects of Law School.”


Implications for Legal Education

These results suggest that, to maximize the learning and emotional adjustment of its graduates, law schools need to focus on enhancing their students’ feelings of autonomy. Why? Because such feelings can have trickledown effects, predicting changes in students’ basic need satisfaction and consequent psychological well-being, effects that may also carry forward into the legal career. Given the excessive incidence of depression among practicing lawyers (Beck et. al., 1995; Eaton et. al., 1990) and the likely negative spillover of that phenomenon to society and the justice system (Benjamin et. al., 1986; Hess, 2002; Krieger, 1998, 2005; McKinney, 2002), these findings may have substantial practical importance.
More…

Francis Bacon on Checking Ambition

07-Dec-07

You might not be very familiar with Francis Bacon’s Essays, Civil and Moral, but I’ve read them all closely—several times. Indeed, I’ve read and reread many of Francis Bacon’s works. I learned a lot from Bacon’s writings as well as from those of two of his famous contemporaries, Chistopher Marlowe and the quasi-enigma William Shakespeare (any Baconian Theorists in the house?).

This morning, a Dream & Hustle blog post, “Open Letter to Leslie Hinton and Robert Thomson,” reminded me of Bacon’s essays. Specifically, it reminded me of Bacon’s essay “Of Ambition” and how Bacon described the ways powerful people use their tools in order to get the most out of the most talented and ambitious men and women in their herds, all the while preventing (or attempting to prevent) their unchecked talented and ambitious sheep from earning opportunities to rule themselves.

The very talented and ambitious social climbers who might come to learn that they had been “checked in their desires” all along might suffer most. Upon discovering their checked (or ruled) status, these folks might have to choose whether to a) attempt to clash with a formidable network of powerful folks who tend to block up-and-comers of lower classes from rising to the ranks of the ruling elite (multimillionaire parvenus are allowed and considered harmless, as they rarely try to do more than make and spend money in ways that wouldn’t threaten the ruling elite’s power) or b) to check their ambition somewhat, submit to the supervision of the ruling elite, and pursue whatever wealth, power, and prestige the ruling elite would allow them to pursue, knowing that if they’d climb too high they’d eventually hit a ceiling made of the thickest glass.
More…

Questions for My Fellow Arizonians (and Ward Connerly)

06-Dec-07

I just read “Some Arizona University Programs Threatened by Proposed Ban on Affirmative Action” by Peter Schmidt (author of Color and Money), and it reminded me of a few questions I asked of a few Black and Hispanic lawyers during a recent meeting. Here are paraphrased versions of the questions I asked.

1) Why would a single Arizonian want or need Ward Connerly to help lead a statewide political campaign to rid Arizona of our affirmative action policies or to change our affirmative action policies?

2) Do Arizonians really need Ward Connerly, someone who is not an Arizonian, to tell us what we need to do with respect to affirmative action?

3) Wouldn’t Arizonians who would follow Ward Connerly’s lead in 2008 look like incompetents who needed an outsider’s help or cowards who were too afraid to attack Arizona’s affirmative action policies until Ward Connerly rolled through?

4) Is Connerly coming to Arizona to help us govern our state better? If so, who invited him and why did they feel we needed him?

5) How could I get the opportunity to debate Ward Connerly live, like Michael Eric Dyson did in 1998 (see Chapter 4, “Myths, Distortions, and History” in Michael Eric Dyson’s Debating Race with Michael Eric Dyson)? I do believe I could make Connerly appear quite unqualified to advise any well-educated, clear-thinking, and fair-minded Arizonian. And, I do believe that I would argue from legal facts, legal theory, historical facts, social scientific facts, leading social science theories, and moral theories even more persuasively than Dr. Dyson did during his debate with Connerly.

In general, I support Arizona’s affirmative action policies. I believe they do us a great deal of good and no harm. However, if a few hundred thousand of my fellow Arizonians really wanted to change or eliminate our current policies for what they believed were culturally-impartial, apolitical, economic, and meritocratic reasons, then I would listen attentively to the smartest proposals from other Arizonians who have invested in OUR Arizona, who raised their families in OUR Arizona, and who care primarily about what affirmative action has done to or for OUR Arizona. I would listen to their proposals carefully and do my best to determine if their proposed policies would improve OUR Arizona economically, socially, or culturally. And I would be disappointed if any decent Arizona politicians or highly respected Arizona institutions or organizations teamed with Ward Connerly in 2008, because I believe doing so would indicate that they needed a guy like Ward Connerly, someone who probably only sees Arizona as a small piece of a much larger campaign, to help them promote their anti-affirmative action agendas. That would make them look politically pitiful in my opinion. The best Arizonians, the ones I agree with and the ones I don’t, would neither need nor request Ward Connerly’s leadership for anything related to how we govern OUR Arizona.

Fisher v Nulan: Ready for Another Weekend Blog Debate?

04-Dec-07

Michael Fisher provided the comments below the break. I’m republishing his comments as a blog post in order to allow others to share their opinions on Fisher’s proposal.

I wouldn’t mind hosting the debate if Michael Fisher and Craig Nulan agree they need or want to have a weekend blog debate. However, I believe the rules, format, and structure of the debate would probably need to be different from the Cobb v. Fisher debate in order for the debate to be more productive and to make it easier for a panel of judges to declare one of the debaters more persuasive or convincing than the other. There were some constructive feedback and critical comments on format and structure provided in the Post Debate: Cobb v Fisher thread and the Audience Thread: Cobb v Fisher thread. We would be wise to review and discuss that feedback and criticism, in an effort to find ways to improve the weekend blog debate platform, before planning a Fisher v Nulan Debate.

I wouldn’t be able to help put something like this together, however, until after December 18, 2007.


Time for another bout.

I assume everyone here is familiar with the recent fall out between Craig Nulan and I. I’ve not been able to pin Craig down to what I would consider a rational argument that would have gone beyond some pretty heavy Nulansian epithets. I surmise that the issues involved may have been confusing to some. So, this is what I propose. As soon as E.C. has the time, I’d like him to comb his hair straight up and stage another bout. This time between Nulan and myself. The debate should be a win-lose debate in which one of the two parties is declared the winner and the other the loser. (we got to set up an impartial jury for that). The resolution to be debated would be as follows:
More…

Connecting with Snoop’s “Sensual Seduction”

02-Dec-07

I’ve not yet attempted to comprehensively evaluate my social capital or to map out my own sociogram. Even so, I know there are two degrees of separation between Calvin Broadus (aka Snoop Dogg) and me. We have at least three mutual friends that we each still talk to or visit annually.

Snoop and I came up in the same city around the same time and graduated from the same high school. We had plenty of mutual friends while we were teenagers. And, back in 1988 or 1989, you might have caught me beat-boxing for Snoop and other rappers while they would battle against one another lyrically in our high school’s quad. But even though one of his high school girlfriends was one of my high school girlfriend’s best friends, and he and I would bump into one another here and there during the late 1980s and early 1990s, we never became friends. Snoop and many of his closest friends were into some things that I was trying to distance myself from back in those days. The last time I saw Snoop face-to-face was the summer of 1993 at a small house party in Long Beach, CA. Those were his pre-Gangsta Rap Boss or pre-International Pimp persona days.

A few nights ago, while taking a study break (like the one I’m taking now), I watched Snoop’s new “Sensual Seduction” video for the first time. I wasn’t really feelin’ it on the first pass. Since then, I’ve listened to the song a few times more, and it’s grown on me. The song’s simple plot is based on some of life’s easy pleasures: sexual foreplay, sex, shopping, eating, playing in the sheets (and probably having a little more sex), smoking (for those who like to smoke), sleeping, and, then doing it all over again, making sure not to “rush the stroke.” Simple and to the point. It will sell a million copies no doubt. It uses a trope we all can relate to. And it’s a song about simple pleasures even the most enlightened among us should try to enjoy. I’m a fan of finding a good balance, and I believe limiting ourselves to too little bodily pleasure is no better than allowing ourselves to benightedly live lives devoted to the pursuit of appetitive pleasures.

So, I’ve connected with Snoop’s “Sensual Seduction,” for some of the same reasons why I connected with L.L. Cool J’s better “Around the Way Girl,” Andre 3000’s much better “Hey Ya!,” William Shakespeare’s even better “Sonnet 129,” and William Blake’s far better “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.”

Cross-Cultural Wisdom & Elite Law School Admissions Decisions Algorithms

30-Nov-07

An article authored by Peter Schmidt and entitled, “Advocates of Diversity Grasp for Ways to Drive Change in Legal Profession,” was published by The Chronicle of Higher Education this morning. I left the following comment in the comments section.


I agree with Steve (Comment #2) that the pressure to maintain high LSAT scores for rankings purposes is probably not the primary reason why more minority students, particularly more African American students, aren’t winning seats with the elite law schools to which they apply. I believe a more significant reason is the lack of cross-cultural competence or lack of cross-cultural empathy at elite law schools and in their admissions teams.

Our best law schools are led by Euro-Americentric scholars and decision-makers. These Euro-Americentric decision-makers needn’t be Whites who were raised in upper-middle-class or upper-class Euro-Americentric cultural and linguistic environments, but I suspect more than 70% of them are. I also suspect very few of these decision-makers took advantage of their opportunities to become very knowledgeable about how minority members of our lower-class or lower-middle-class use language, how they interpret and remember complex ideas, or how they demonstrate their comprehensions of complex ideas.
More…

Thanksgiving Dinner Deipnosophistry

25-Nov-07

Sherrylin Ifill’s “Musings for Thanksgiving Dinner” inspired me to share a comment about an excellent post-Thanksgiving dinner conversation I participated in. After rereading my comment a few minutes ago, I decided to re-publish it here.


Before our dinner guests arrived, I had predicted there would be too little political-ideological disagreement among them to enable us to spend most of our time talking politics and still hope to gain anything inspirational or novel from our conversations. Soon after some of us had begun to talk about the standard political flavors of the month, I saw nonverbal signals and overheard some comments that led me to believe a night filled with a series of easy or ambiguous political conversations would probably leave most of our guests feeling empty at the end of the night.

Being a bit of deipnosophist, I’m always prepared to entertain after dinner. So, once I had formed an opinion about where our early political conversations were going to lead us, I informed (threatened) our guests that if we would fail to create at least one challenging and memorable conversation, then I would save our evening by reciting, from memory, an eclectic selection of my favorite Shakespeare Sonnets, Yeats poems, and Prince Rogers Nelson lyrics, and then, if there would be enough time left, I might go on to read from Erasmus’s Praise of Folly, Dr. Samuel Johnson’s The Rambler essays, or La Rochefoucauld’s Maxims. That seemed to motivate our guests to create a few very interesting and memorable conversations.
More…

Our Rulers Will Use Their Tools

25-Nov-07

“I wonder what will happen here if supplies crash (like the water supply is crashing in Atlanta), or, TPTB simply cut off supplies in selected cities for political reasons?”
—cnulan, “75th Anniversary of Genocidal Man-made Famine

The comment I had planned to leave in the above-quoted Subrealism discussion thread was long and would have been truncated. So, I decided to publish it here and hit cnulan with a trackback.


TPTB, thanks a lot to the help they received from their militarily-skilled ancestors, have done a great job of positioning themselves to be the last ones standing if the world were forced to finally play out a military, political, or economic end-game due to extreme resource scarcity. The most avaricious, hedonistic, and megalomaniacal peoples among us, having devoted millennia to seizing much of their power from the world’s other peoples and having unmeritocratically, yet skillfully, bequeathed that power to their descendants across the ages, now have a nice selection of tools at their disposal for killing, controlling, or indebting their militarily, politically, and economically weaker (and almost always darker) worldmates. Moreover, they have proved they were more than willing to us these tools when their opulence levels were threatened or when their acquisition rates stopped increasing at what they had been taught by their ancestors were acceptable rates. Indeed, the most powerful cultural descendants of Greece, Rome, and early Europe seem to believe, quite religiously, that they are here to rule mankind and make the world obey. And they seem to have readied themselves to rule all the way to the finish if an end-game due to extreme resource scarcity begins before technology postpones or eliminates the need for the end-game.
More…

Theodore Roosevelt on How to Use a Silver Spoon

23-Nov-07

Here’s another lengthy comment I submitted to the discussion thread for Cobb’s “The First 22 Rules” and that I thought was good enough to share here as a blog post.


I’m not a huge fan of Theodore Roosevelt for several reasons, but I find myself returning to his writings, especially his famous speeches “The Strenuous Life” and “National Duties” every year. Few have been born with bigger silver spoons than his. He certainly had the option, like Adrian Veidt (perhaps better known as “Ozymandias” by readers of Alan Moore’s and Dave Gibbons’s Watchmen), to live a life of aristocratic effeteness. But he didn’t. Instead, he chose a strenuous aristocratic life; he submitted himself to tests, and he toiled nobly. And, his writings persuaded me that he measured men, even those born with silver spoons, based on how well they used the resources they started with and how much better their nation was made by their ideas or deeds.

The second paragraph of his “The Strenuous Life” represents Roosevelt at his manliest and aristocratic best. I quote from it below.
More…

Unjust Gauntlets and Barbarity

21-Nov-07

I didn’t plan on publishing any new posts for a few more weeks; however, I just reread a lengthy comment I submitted to the good discussion thread for Cobb’s “The First 22 Rules,” and I thought it was good enough to share here as a blog post.


Cobb:

As for my pitiless attitude, I think it’s rather typical of the Old School. I can’t imagine my grandparents cutting me any slack given my opportunities to compete with white kids in the same schools.”

If you started off with two well-educated parents, grandparents who actually were around to support your two parents, and middle-class or better socioeconomic status, you probably had everything you needed to easily earn at least a middle-class life for yourself and your family. The day you were born, most of the work had already been done for you, Cobb. You were blessed with plenty of valuable privileges you didn’t have to work for. And your family had to do little more than persuade you to do your homework, so you wouldn’t mess it all up.

And, though our society enabled your similarly situated White peers to maintain their middle-class statuses more easily than it allowed you to maintain yours, you should have only had to work slightly harder than your average similarly situated White peer in order to maintain your middle-class status. So, you should not have been cut any slack. To cut a kid like you slack would have been a slap in the face to your parents, your grandparents, and the generations who busted their tails so you could be blessed enough to be born into a middle-class Black family and have a near-fair chance to live a middle-class or better U.S. life.
More…

Holiday Gift Recommendations for Black Friends & Family

15-Nov-07

Yes, it’s that time of year. You know, that time of year when you realize that having a lot of good friends and family has its benefits and its costs. :)

Gift-giving is an art form, in my opinion. I don’t like to give gift cards to my family members and closest friends. I think that’s just plain lazy. I prefer to give them gifts that signal I had something special about them in mind when I purchased their gifts. 50% of the time, I give books. 25% of the time, I give CDs or DVDs. 10% of the time, I give food. 10% of the time, I give gadgets, art, tools, clothes, games, toys, spirits, or professional accessories. And 5% of the time, often reluctantly and by request, I give away gift cards.

The gifts I give away to my Black friends are often different from the gifts I give away to my other friends. I try to promote Black authors, especially young Black scholars, Black-owned businesses, pro-Black ideas, and Black cultural traditions, such as pro-Black Hip Hop, when I give them gifts.

Below are a few of my recommendations for the 2007 gift-giving season that might help you decide what to give a few of your Black friends and family.

Please share some of your 2007 gift ideas in the comments thread. I’m always looking for interesting gift ideas.


Books for College-Educated Black Friends Who Read at Least a Dozen Books Per Year

Africana, Henry Louis Gates and Kwame Anthony Appiah
This is the pricey 2005 5-volume edition, but it is worth every penny and every Black family that can afford it should have it.
W.E.B. Du Bois Writings (Library of America Edition), W.E.B. Du Bois
James Baldwin Collected Essays (Library of America Edition), James Baldwin
If one of your college-educated Black friends doesn’t have copies of these two books, then be a good friend and give him or her copies.
In a Shade of Blue, Eddie S. Glaude, Jr.
My vote for best Black-authored book published in 2007.
Waiting ‘Til the Midnight Hour, Peniel E. Joseph
I’ve read half of this one. It’s an outstanding history of the Black Power Institution.
Reparations, Alfred L. Brophy
This is the very best primer on the reparations debate.
More…

On What It Means to Be a Successful U.S. Black: Angela Davis vs. Condoleezza Rice

13-Nov-07

Condoleezza Rice said…

In America, with education and hard work, it really does not matter where you came from - it matters where you are going. But that truth cannot be sustained if it is not renewed in each generation - as it was with my grandfather.
—Condoleeza Rice, Remarks by Condoleezza Rice at the 2000 Republican National Convention

My parents were very strategic. I was going to be so well prepared, and I was going to do all of these things that were revered in white society so well, that I would be armoured somehow from racism. I would be able to confront white society on its own terms.
—Condoleeza Rice, in Lessons of Might and Right How Segregation and an Indomitable Family Shaped National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice by Dale Russakoff for Washington Post Magazine, September 9, 2001.

Responding to the above-quoted comments, Angela Davis said…

It was never about individuals. I never grew up thinking that the measure of my success was as an individual. There was always a sense that the measure of your success was to a large part one that was linked to community advancement. Most people weren’t going to make it as far as she or I did. She never would have had the opportunities she had without the benefit of the struggles that took place in the 60s. If you can, with conscience, talk about a post-civil rights era, we have to talk about the limitations of civil rights. It produced individual successes but it never produced group successes.

The Republican administration is the most diverse in history. But when the inclusion of black people into the machine of oppression is designed to make that machine work more efficiently, then it does not represent progress at all. We have more black people in more visible and powerful positions. But then we have far more black people who have been pushed down to the bottom of the ladder. When people call for diversity and link it to justice and equality, that’s fine. But there’s a model of diversity as the difference that makes no difference, the change that brings about no change.
—Angela Davis, in ‘We used to think there was a black community’ by Gary Younge for The Guardian, November 8, 2007.


Davis and Rice come from the same city, Birmingham, Alabama, and they inherited the same socioeconomic status, middle-class. They are both very intelligent and highly educated. They both have led important lives that many people esteem. One of them, Rice, will finish the game having earned great wealth, power, and prestige by pleasing the U.S. power elite. The other, Davis, will finish the game having earned far, far less wealth, power, and prestige by displeasing the U.S. power elite. Yet, each will probably believe she had lived a better life, as a U.S. Black person, than the other. Depending on how you’d define “Successful U.S. Black,” you’d probably judge that one of them would be wrong.

Before you decide, please consider the following questions.
More…

Hyper-minorities & Academic Performance

12-Nov-07

Take a peek at this short article, “Minority Students Fare Better in Colleges When High-School Classmates Also Enroll, Researchers Say” published by The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 11, 2007.

A working draft of the paper containing the preliminary findings referenced in the article can be viewed here. Please do not reference this draft paper without obtaining the authors’ permissions.


Even though sociologists, social psychologists, and education scholars have studied these phenomena, still too little has been done by university policymakers to address the social and cultural challenges low-income and lower-middle-income minority students face in formidable university environments where they represent a very small percentage of the student population, such as elite universities, top graduate programs, and top professional schools. In these types of environments, talented minorities from low-income and lower-middle-income families become what I call hyper-minorities. They are not only minorities phenotypically, but they are also often socioeconomic, cultural, and linguistic (their native languages or English dialects are often different from those used in their new environments) minorities. Additionally, they are often disconnected from the social networks that helped them succeed socially and academically before they became hyper-minorities.
More…

Titanic Gets the Mic

11-Nov-07

I shared Titanic with an audience for the first time last night. It was an open mic night.

Years ago, I wrote poems that were similar to those of the poets who recited their wonderfully rhythmic, insightfully political, and courageously personal poems from memory last night. My wife and I listened, amazed, as we watched several talented poets slam. My plans were to enjoy a night on the town with my wife, eat some great soul food at one of our new Black-owned restaurants in downtown Tucson, “A Touch of Class,” chill out with a few Black graduate student friends who had helped market the event, and show my support for our talented Black poets and music artists. I did not plan to share my poetry or even tell anyone I write poems. My best poetry is more difficult and allusive than the poetry one expects to hear at a poetry slam. However, the host poet, Chillin Da Conscious Poet, asked me if I wrote poems; I told her I did; and then, she demanded that I share at least one of my poems. I have six poems of mine in my memory. I shared Titanic.
More…

Defining Afrocentricity

09-Nov-07

Temple University African American Studies Professor Molefi Asante provides the following definition for ‘Afrocentricity’.

[1] Afrocentricity is a mode of thought and action in which the centrality of African interests, values, and perspectives predominate. [2] In regards to theory, it is the placing of African people in the center of any analysis of African phenomena. [3] Thus, it is possible for any one to master the discipline of seeking the location of Africans in a given phenomenon. [4] In terms of action and behavior, it is a devotion to the idea that what is in the best interest of African consciousness is at the heart of ethical behavior. [5] Finally, Afrocentricity seeks to enshrine the idea that blackness itself is a trope of ethics. [6] Thus, to be black is to be against all forms of oppression, racism, classism, homophobia, patriarchy, child abuse, pedophilia, and white racial domination.
—Molefi Kete Asante, Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change

I doubt most scholars and intellectuals who use the nouns ‘Afrocentricity’ or ‘Afrocentrism’, or the adjective ‘Afrocentric’ have Asante’s six-sentence definition in mind when they do. Most of them would probably use sentences similar to Asante’s first and second sentences in their definitions. Since the third sentence represents an argument about a disputable fact rather than a mere description, I’m not confident most folks would use it in their definitions. Sentences four, five, and six are effectively distilled restatements of the thesis Asante lays out in his book, Afrocentricity. I’m very confident most folks would not agree enough with Asante’s thesis to include his fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences in their definitions.
More…

What Did Oscar Micheaux Think of Richard Wright?

08-Nov-07

“I’m flippantly certain that Oscar Micheaux’s criticism of Native Son would be fascinating and reveal many of the same problems “we” are still suffering with today.”
—the rasx() context, “Flippant Remarks about Oscar Micheaux and Richard Wright


Oscar Micheaux died, while on the road selling his novels, more than a decade after Richard Wright’s Native Son had been published. Micheaux was definitely aware of Wright’s works. Indeed, I suspect Micheaux might have decided to take a break from producing films in the 1940s so he could write more novels and travel around selling them as a response of sorts to the success of Wright’s publications.

During the 1940s, Micheaux wrote several novels, one of which was The Story of Dorothy Stanfield. In the book, Micheaux signals he is not exactly a fan of Wright’s. Micheaux would have had us believe that his portrayals of intelligent and independent Blacks living middle-class or better lives, his controversial views about Black entrepreneurship and collective Black economic uplift, and his critical comments about Whites’ lack of support for pro-Black films (Micheaux always had difficulty finding investors to back his pro-Black films), were at least three of the reasons why Whites liked his work much less than Wright’s.
More…

Supporting Black Bloggers’ Businesses

08-Nov-07

This morning, I read Exodus Mentality’s blog post “Support a Black Business.” The post resonated with me. What is being asked of me in the post makes perfect economic and ethical sense.

I believe STRONGLY that I have a moral obligation to support skilled and integrity-filled Black entrepreneurs. I suspect one way I can support Black entrepreneurs is to support the Black entrepreneurs who are also Black bloggers I read. So, I added a “Black Bloggers’ Businesses” hyperlink section to my blog this morning. Though I’ll never sell advertising space here at Maxambit, from this point forward, I’ll advertise some Black Bloggers’ businesses for free.

If your blog is on my blogroll, that means I read what you write. It doesn’t mean I agree with all or even most of the arguments in your writings, but it does mean that I respect your ideas enough to read them and consider them.

If a) your blog is on my blogroll and b) you own a business that has been up and running at least three years, then I might be willing to add your business website to my Black Bloggers’ Businesses hyperlink section. I won’t add your business website hyperlink, however, unless you give me permission to add it. You may give your permission to me by leaving a comment in this thread (please include your business website). Or you may send me a private email via this blog’s Contact Form. Of course, I’d also promptly remove your business website hyperlink from my Black Bloggers’ Businesses section if you would ever request it.

Introducing Peniel E. Joseph

06-Nov-07

A few weeks ago, a friend informed me that historian, scholarly author, activist, and Brandeis University African American Studies Professor, Peniel E. Joseph would be discussing a book he published, last year in hardcover and this year in paperback, on C-SPAN 2’s Book TV. Respecting this friend’s recommendations highly, I tuned in. After I had watched Peniel’s Book TV presentation, I got online and purchased his new book. The book, Waiting ‘Til the Midnight Hour: A Narrative History of Black Power in America, arrived yesterday. I browsed through it last night and earlier this morning, and, then, decided to add this book to my short reading list for the holiday season.

Waiting 'Til the Midnight Hour

Peniel convinced me that I still have plenty to learn about the history of the Black Power Institution. He convinced me that even though I misunderstand the Black Power Institution and its 20th Century history far less than the average person, I should understand it far better than I do now. He also convinced me that reading his book would be a great way for me to increase my knowledge of the subject in only ten to fifteen hours. So, I shall sit with this talented young scholar’s ideas in a few weeks and expand my understanding of this important institution and the social context from which it emerged. And, I thank Peniel for this fine fruit that his scholarly toil has born for our benefit.

Close
E-mail It